For many people, being home alone is not intrinsically terrifying. Yes, he steals a toothbrush in what is a fleeting moment of rebellion, but he is not in a state of constant evasion. Before that, Kevin is simply an 8-year-old boy who is by himself at his Chicago home. Almost all of the tension in Home Alone arises in the third act when Harry and Marv intrude. The second film presents Kevin with far more obstacles than he encounters in the first film. He cannot blame his ignorant family, and so he has to work a lot harder than he does in the first film to earn the audience’s empathy. Kevin’s sloppy organisational skills have landed him in this predicament. This time, the separation from his family occurs because Kevin’s priorities are all messed up. In Home Alone 2, Kevin does well to make it to the airport, but, distracted by a frantic mission to find batteries for his Talkboy, boards a flight to New York City instead of Miami. He is essentially left behind due to his family’s carelessness and neglectful tendencies. Kevin sleeps in longer than anyone else, but his family thinks he is on the airport shuttle bus due to a flawed head count. In Home Alone, damaged power lines reset the alarm clocks at the McCallister residence, causing the family to sleep in and almost miss their flight to Paris. Home Alone 2: Lost in New York is superior to Home Alone, and if you choose to read on, you may even agree with this seemingly sacrilegious statement. By orchestrating this plot overlap, he successfully cemented a formula that the subsequent Home Alone movies could not grasp. Of course he would borrow from the first film (which he directed). This just proves that Chris Columbus is a smart man. Essentially, you shouldn’t use “But, it just copies the first film” as a criticism against Home Alone 2.
#Home alone 2 bellhop movie
This movie follows virtually the same plot as the first Hangover, and because the first film is unfunny and lazy, it’s not something I want to subject myself to again. Why wouldn’t you want to see another movie that contains much of the same elements, but in a new, vitalised setting? I could understand if you were talking about The Hangover Part II.
I mean, Home Alone is a pretty fun, solid movie. Then there are the vocal detractors who lambast Home Alone 2 for committing the crime of mimicry, which is less a comment on the film itself and more of a comment on precedence. Most people I know acknowledge its existence but cherish the first film, Home Alone (1990), that little bit more. Home Alone 2: Lost in New York (1992) is one such sequel. Many first sequels are maligned for being carbon copies of the films that preceded them. Simultaneously, there is a desire to assert his or her artistic licence, and to play with convention in a way that is refreshing and adequately challenging. He or she feels indebted to fans of the original film, and realises that straying too far from the predecessor is a risky venture.
The director of a first sequel is always under monumental pressure.
0 kommentar(er)
